More gcc/glibc weirdness

Gerard Beekmans gerard at linuxfromscratch.org
Thu Feb 20 11:25:13 PST 2003


On February 8, 2003 04:32 am, Greg Schafer wrote:
> Howver, I think it safer to have it correct from the beginning. Therefore I
> propose we change the "--disable-shared" in Ch 5 gcc to "--enable-shared".
> This will also result in "libgcc_s.so.1" getting built in th Ch 5 gcc, but
> I don't forsee any problem with this.

Is that part of the pure-lfs hint or should I bugzilla it separately?

-- 
Gerard Beekmans
www.linuxfromscratch.org

-*- If Linux doesn't have the solution, you have the wrong problem -*-
-- 
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-dev' in the subject header of the message



More information about the lfs-dev mailing list