Lee at nospamhancock1980.freeserve.co.uk
Fri Feb 21 01:01:09 PST 2003
Yep I think you are right, just debugged libc-2.3.1.so and its linked /
refers to. libgcc_s.so.1.
"Greg Schafer" <gschafer at zip.com.au> wrote in message
news:20030221054106.GB25042 at tigers-lfs.nsw.bigpond.net.au...
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 10:22:42PM +0000, Lee Hancock wrote:
> > Just complete purelfs, all went great. One question though, with new
> > releases of gcc and glibc just around the corner, can i tar-up the
> > directory and reuse it later or would I be best recreating stage1?
> You could. But part of the cleanliness is achieved by using the same
> package versions in Ch 5 & Ch 6 so I'd go for recreating.
> Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
> and put 'unsubscribe lfs-dev' in the subject header of the message
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-dev' in the subject header of the message
More information about the lfs-dev