Coreutils - incident of note

Matthew Burgess ca9mbu at
Sat Feb 22 01:39:15 PST 2003

"Gerard Beekmans" <gerard at> wrote in message
news:20030222005335.GB5892 at
> On Sat, Feb 22, 2003 at 01:50:23AM +0100, John Nielsen wrote:
> > The coreutils configure seems to pass fine on:
> It's not a matter of passing, it's a matter of how it passes. Even on
> system the configure passes just fine, but it first runs out of RAM
> which the kernel intervenes by killing the subprocess off.

Incidentally, what does configure say to that test then, when the
process gets killed off?  I'd assume it returns no?

Unsubscribe: send email to listar at
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-dev' in the subject header of the message

More information about the lfs-dev mailing list