Pure LFS - good to go

Gerard Beekmans gerard at linuxfromscratch.org
Sat Feb 22 17:45:40 PST 2003

On February 22, 2003 04:15 pm, Greg Schafer wrote:
> Well, I am still skeptical about it. Sure it's nice to go through patches
> from various sources and see whats what. But I think just blindly applying
> patches from distros without proper analysis by capaable programmers is
> just plain dangerous.

Understood. And agreed too.

> Having said that, I know from personal experience, that even without guru
> programming talent, if you do enough research and have enough common sense
> then appropriate patches can be produced. My lfs tweaks page attempted to
> justify each patch and this is the kind of thing I'd like to see for any
> lfs patches effort i.e. justification of patches.

I wouldn't want the patches site to become a big list of every conceivable 
patch people can drum up and think of. It should be the kind of patch like 
this GCC garbage collection patch. It was well tested by some of the LFSers 
here, shown that it's a technically sound patch so we could list this patch 
on the website. So yes I fully agree a lot of research and testing should be 
done before we just post a patch. This will slow things down for updates, but 
at least it'll be justified.

Gerard Beekmans

-*- If Linux doesn't have the solution, you have the wrong problem -*-
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-dev' in the subject header of the message

More information about the lfs-dev mailing list