Binutils 2.13.2.1 and GCC 3.2.2

Dan Osterrath Dan.Osterrath at gmx.de
Fri Feb 28 00:22:53 PST 2003


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

> Does anybody know of the GCC 3.2.1 bug that could not handle the 4 dotted
> numbers of binutils remains in 3.2.2?  I'm going to be testing the new
> "Pure LFS" hint and I was wondering if it was OK to go to 2.13.2.1 now that
> GCC 3.2.2 is out.  I do know that the differences between 2.13.2 and
> 2.13.2.1 were documentation only.

Yes, we know of that. It isn't anymore there in gcc 3.2.2 as the patch for the 
gcc team was provided by LFS guys.

(Especially Greg and me, I think. ;-) But don't blame me, if it wasn't Greg.)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+XxxgvgjqR9suK90RAoCyAJ40yuMQ0DI68cDP/x2HheruziYY7wCfeBUv
CGlCtKkH3KaHMiZ2Dk7TWio=
=1ftm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-- 
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-dev' in the subject header of the message



More information about the lfs-dev mailing list