Splitting up the 'mega' patches

Gerard Beekmans gerard at linuxfromscratch.org
Thu Jan 2 17:59:23 PST 2003

On January 2, 2003 06:29 pm, Gerard Beekmans wrote:
> I'll file a new bug in Bugzilla detailing which patches should be changed

Sorry, I wanted to paste the bug report in the email. Here goes.

Filed as Bug #461:

<quote source="http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=461">
After discussing on lfs-dev I've come to agree that some of the patches are 
best to be sed's, especially when it concerns simple s/foo/bar/ statements.

The following patches are good candidates to be sed's again:
- Gawk patch
- Glibc Root/Perl patch
- Kbd patch
- Man Manpath patch
- Man Pager patch
- Sh-utils Hostname patch

Please note: good candidates. Make a sed, make it look readable. If it looks 
too complicated or too ugly, don't do it.

Gerard Beekmans

-*- If Linux doesn't have the solution, you have the wrong problem -*-
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-dev' in the subject header of the message

More information about the lfs-dev mailing list