patches for flex-2.5.4a

Tushar Teredesai tushar at
Thu Jan 2 19:46:30 PST 2003

Greg Schafer wrote:

>No offence dude, but I don't reckon its worth it (for inclusion in the book
>that is). If we go down this path then we'll be scrutinizing every RPM and
>DEB out there to see what patches we should be using. Also, ttmkfdir is
>obsolete when X 4.3 is released.
None taken:) I don't have problems if the patch is not included. I just 
wanted to bring it to attention of someone who could decide whether they 
should be included or not.

Actually, I don't think we should go looking for patches from Redhat, 
etal. I went on a fishing expidition coz I could not get ttmkfdir to 
compile and found the above patches. Only one of the patches was useful 
to fix ttmkfdir problem, but the patch names sounded important enough 
(glibc22, gcc3...).

Tushar Teredesai

Unsubscribe: send email to listar at
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-dev' in the subject header of the message

More information about the lfs-dev mailing list