Bug 215: Nonexistant?

Seth W.Klein sk at sethwklein.net
Wed Jan 8 12:04:15 PST 2003


Mark Lee <mplee at shaw.ca> wrote:
> 
> While looking through the discussion for bug 215 [....]
> If there was a redundant 
> MANPATH than shouldn't the developers of man be informed? If it is something 
> to do with the symlinks in our directory structure, than shouldn't we mention 
> what causes this?
> 
> I don't mean to come off accusatory, I just wanted to make sure that what 
> happened should have happened (just making sure that the right decision was 
> made).

It's the symlink /usr/man -> share/man. I personally have two
directories and fix packages with the eventual goal of removing
/usr/man. Most packages honor a config.site file.

cheers,
Seth W. Klein
-- 
sk at sethwklein.net                         http://www.sethwklein.net/
Maintainer, LFS FAQ             http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
     Support high technical standards, research before posting.
-- 
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-dev' in the subject header of the message



More information about the lfs-dev mailing list