forward from the lsb-impl

Ken Dyke ken_i_m at elegantinnovations.net
Tue Jan 14 20:03:02 PST 2003


With all the threads about findutils lately I was have trouble finding
the one where the "alpha" versions were discussed.  So, I have started a
new thread. :-/

Below is a snip from a post on the LSB sample implementation mailing
list.

On Tue, 2003-01-14 at 17:07, Wichmann, Mats D wrote:
> *snip*
> (3) two base packages have "unofficial" versions
> with interesting status:
>  
> findutils is at 4.1.7 ("released" is 4.1)
> and tar is at 1.13.25 ("released" is 1.13).
> 
> Both have been in this "alpha" state for a
> very long time, and all distros I have access
> to, even old ones, are using these versions.
> 
> Benefits of "alpha" versions:
> a. eliminates need to use lsbsi-specific patch
> b. eliminates all lsb-runtime test failures in
>    these two packages
> c. matches what everyone seems to be using (less
>    any vendor-specific patches, of course)
> 
> Disadvantages:
> a. no longer using "formally released" upstream
> b. testing impace (tests already done on ia32, Itanium:
>    no regressions, each fixes two)
> *snip*

-- 
I think, therefore, ken_i_m
Chief Gadgeteer,
Elegant Innovations
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/lfs-dev/attachments/20030114/3092ef0f/attachment.sig>


More information about the lfs-dev mailing list