FAQ vs. Immediate Answer?
sk at sethwklein.net
Wed Jan 15 10:43:50 PST 2003
Bill's LFS Login <lfsbill at wlmcs.com> wrote:
> >From sk at sethwklein.net Wed Jan 15 07:31:25 2003
> Bruce Dubbs <bdubbs at swbell.net> wrote:
> > 1. Please post this to blfs-support.
> > 2. When starting a new request, do NOT reply to another message
> > and change the header. It attaches your message to the wrong
> > thread.
> Please don't post answers that are in the FAQ. Please post references
> to the FAQ instead. In this case the relevent entries are:
> Second, in past threads dealing with common courtesy, when certain
> individuals posted *only* references to applicable documentation, they
> have been chided by others that they should have also provided the
> answer at that time. [....]
I overstated above.
If Bruce had mentioned the FAQ at all, even without the recommanded
faq.html#question link, i would not have posted.
The part of your post, Bill, that i snipped sounded as if i was
issuing an ultimatim. I don't think it is appropriate or necessary
to have an ultimatim on this subject. I was simply reminding Bruce
as i have in the past had to remind many people including many high
"ranking" LFS people.
It is my practice and general recommendation to post the url and
a one line type summary unless there is an unusual reason to force
the "asker" to actually visit the FAQ. That extra line has a much
friendlier tone and is less likely to set off the "you were rude
to a stupid newbie" police. (I say stupid newbie because there are
Seth W. Klein
sk at sethwklein.net http://www.sethwklein.net/
Maintainer, LFS FAQ http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-dev' in the subject header of the message
More information about the lfs-dev