Version number of next LFS release

Gerard Beekmans gerard at
Wed Jan 15 16:35:39 PST 2003

On January 15, 2003 05:19 pm, Jesse Tie-Ten-Quee wrote:
> (&%(!&$(@!&, sigh.  So much for the blfs-book staying as a seperate
> entity.

I agree it won't be workable. We'd have to coordinate new releases all the 
time. What if there isn't anything in BLFS changed since the last LFS release 
(unlikely, but just a theory)...we'd release BLFS again without changes. Kind 
of odd.

But, BLFS is better off being a separate project. For most part BLFS doesn't 
depend on a specific LFS version anyway so they can go their own paths.

Gerard Beekmans

-*- If Linux doesn't have the solution, you have the wrong problem -*-
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-dev' in the subject header of the message

More information about the lfs-dev mailing list