Version number of next LFS release
bdubbs at swbell.net
Wed Jan 15 18:50:44 PST 2003
Gerard Beekmans wrote:
>For most part BLFS doesn't
>depend on a specific LFS version anyway so they can go their own paths.
I disagree. We do rely on LFS and build to the current version. The
issue of bison and XFree86 (and other packages) come to mind
immediately. Of course the glibc and gcc issues affect BLFS too.
I've already told Mark that, in my opinion, we should sync BLFS to LFS
and make addidional releases as separate point releases.
LFS 5.0 -> BLFS 5.0, 5.01, 5.02, etc
LFS 5.1 -> BLFS 5.1, 5.1.1, 5.1.2, etc
Because we have so many more packages than LFS, we will always need to
roll the version number at least as fast as LFS.
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-dev' in the subject header of the message
More information about the lfs-dev