Version number of next LFS release

Gerard Beekmans gerard at
Wed Jan 15 18:58:56 PST 2003

On January 15, 2003 07:50 pm, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> I disagree.  We do rely on LFS and build to the current version.  The
> issue of bison and XFree86 (and other packages) come to mind
> immediately.  Of course the glibc and gcc issues affect BLFS too.
> I've already told Mark that, in my opinion, we should sync BLFS to LFS
> and make addidional releases as separate point releases.
> LFS 5.0  -> BLFS 5.0, 5.01, 5.02, etc
> LFS 5.1 -> BLFS 5.1, 5.1.1, 5.1.2, etc

Ok there is merit there. In the end it's of course up to you, the BLFS team, 
what you think is best. I don't have a preference either way.

Gerard Beekmans

-*- If Linux doesn't have the solution, you have the wrong problem -*-
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-dev' in the subject header of the message

More information about the lfs-dev mailing list