/usr/src/linux & /usr/src/linux-2.4.20 directories

Jeremy Herbison herbie at autobotcity.net
Wed Jan 22 11:30:48 PST 2003


Since we don't symlink header files, there is no need to keep the kernel
source tree at all AFAIK. Of course if you want to that's cool, but
there should be no need to make the linux symlink or anything.

-----Original Message-----
From: lfs-dev-bounce at linuxfromscratch.org
[mailto:lfs-dev-bounce at linuxfromscratch.org] On Behalf Of Rainer Peter
Feller
Sent: January 22, 2003 7:56 AM
To: lfs-dev at linuxfromscratch.org
Subject: Re: /usr/src/linux & /usr/src/linux-2.4.20 directories

On Wed, 22 Jan 2003, Axel wrote:

> the book talk about /usr/src/linux directory when it is time to
compile
> the keymap in the kernel.
> but the directory "linux" doesn't exist, the kernel sources are in the
> /usr/src/linux-2.4.20 directory
> Should a symlink linux which would point the linux-2.4.xx directory be
> created?

yup, the best is if you have a symlink to the kernelsources from which
you
run the kernel.

  H
CUH Rainer Peter Feller
  H

-- 
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-dev' in the subject header of the message

-- 
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-dev' in the subject header of the message



More information about the lfs-dev mailing list