Major CVS LFS bug - binutils-2.13.2.1

Gerard Beekmans gerard at linuxfromscratch.org
Mon Jan 27 15:54:47 PST 2003


On January 27, 2003 04:39 pm, Gerard Beekmans wrote:
> I doubt that'll work with gcc-3.2.1
>
> If GCC-3.2.1 can't deal with a version string of 2.13.1.2 how can it
> properly deal with a 2.13.90.0.18 string (containing 5 parts)

Well apparently Greg said it works fine with that binutils version.

So I'm thoroughly confused now. I thought the problem was gcc not being able 
to grok a version string that contains more than 3 parts (x.y.z) but these 5 
parts in HJ Lu's version work fine?



-- 
Gerard Beekmans
www.linuxfromscratch.org

-*- If Linux doesn't have the solution, you have the wrong problem -*-
-- 
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-dev' in the subject header of the message



More information about the lfs-dev mailing list