Major CVS LFS bug - binutils-220.127.116.11
spyro at f2s.com
Mon Jan 27 18:06:05 PST 2003
On Tue, 28 Jan 2003 00:19:28 -0000
"Matthew Burgess" <ca9mbu at eos.sunderland.ac.uk> wrote:
> Oh sod it, I've just retyped this thing 3 times following on from
> different replies. Let's just go with HJ's release hey? If it'll
> make gcc and the chaps on LKML happy then it can't be bad can it?
I think we shouldnt on priciple. its BAD to be having people running off
with (a copy of) the ball and hiding in a corner with it, especially so
on packages as fundamental as binutils. Not to be encouraged.
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-dev' in the subject header of the message
More information about the lfs-dev