Major CVS LFS bug - binutils-2.13.2.1

Greg Schafer gschafer at zip.com.au
Mon Jan 27 19:15:36 PST 2003


On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 09:14:01PM -0600, Jack Brown wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Jan 2003 21:09:02 -0600, Jack Brown wrote:
> > Also, correct me if I'm wrong, but don't we still need to use this hack
> > in chapter 5 regardless wether we use GNU's version or not? what the big
> > problem with just doing the same thing in chapter 6?  all were doing is
> > makeing sure the config behaves, were not modifying C code or anything?
> > 
> > Jack Brown
>  
> hmm looking over the CVS Book I don''t see the hack in gcc's chapter 5
> instructions, but from what I recall of that discussion it should still
> be there. (usnfortunatly searching the mailing list still doesn't work).
> After all we have no idea which version of binutils will be present on
> the host system and the static gcc is the one used to build the first
> glibc (the ne used fr building all of LFS but the 2nd glibc and the
> kernel)
> 
> Shouldn't that be added back in regardless what else we do?

C'mon Jack. You normally pay more attention than that! :-)

http://archive.linuxfromscratch.org/mail-archives/lfs-dev/2002/12/0629.html

Greg
-- 
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-dev' in the subject header of the message



More information about the lfs-dev mailing list