Major CVS LFS bug - binutils-22.214.171.124
gschafer at zip.com.au
Mon Jan 27 19:28:46 PST 2003
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 09:25:13PM -0600, Jack Brown wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Jan 2003 21:15:14 -0600, Greg Schafer wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 09:14:01PM -0600, Jack Brown wrote:
> >> Shouldn't that be added back in regardless what else we do?
> > C'mon Jack. You normally pay more attention than that! :-)
> > http://archive.linuxfromscratch.org/mail-archives/lfs-dev/2002/12/0629.html
> > Greg
> Ooo right, forgot about the --with-ld=/lfs/static/... thing. Thanks.
> Regardless, my vote would be to stay with GNU binutils.
I still stand by what I said here:-
IMHO, the evidence is mounting against the FSF version. And Ian should
really gets his facts straight before sprouting off..
Personally, I've made the move to the HJ release and haven't looked back
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-dev' in the subject header of the message
More information about the lfs-dev