/usr/src/linux & /usr/src/linux-2.4.20 directories

Dagmar d'Surreal dagmar.wants at nospam.com
Mon Jan 27 22:53:58 PST 2003


On Mon, 2003-01-27 at 19:40, Tushar Teredesai wrote:

> I don't have anything against the symlink, I have it on my system coz it 
> is the most painless thing to do:) But the packages that require the 
> source to be in /usr/src/linux are broken (just as the packages that 
> need /usr/include/X11 -> /usr/X11R6/include/X11 symlink are).

What I want to know is how _specifically_ is this supposed to be
broken?  So far, no one has bothered to cite any reasons.
 
-- 
The email address above is just as phony as it looks, and for obvious reasons.
Instant messaging contact nfo: AIM: evilDagmar  Jabber: evilDagmar at jabber.org

-- 
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-dev' in the subject header of the message



More information about the lfs-dev mailing list