/usr/src/linux & /usr/src/linux-2.4.20 directories

Dagmar d'Surreal dagmar.wants at nospam.com
Mon Jan 27 22:53:58 PST 2003

On Mon, 2003-01-27 at 19:40, Tushar Teredesai wrote:

> I don't have anything against the symlink, I have it on my system coz it 
> is the most painless thing to do:) But the packages that require the 
> source to be in /usr/src/linux are broken (just as the packages that 
> need /usr/include/X11 -> /usr/X11R6/include/X11 symlink are).

What I want to know is how _specifically_ is this supposed to be
broken?  So far, no one has bothered to cite any reasons.
The email address above is just as phony as it looks, and for obvious reasons.
Instant messaging contact nfo: AIM: evilDagmar  Jabber: evilDagmar at jabber.org

Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-dev' in the subject header of the message

More information about the lfs-dev mailing list