Major CVS LFS bug - binutils-2.13.2.1

Ian Molton spyro at f2s.com
Tue Jan 28 01:48:01 PST 2003


On Tue, 28 Jan 2003 03:28:26 +0000 (UTC)
gschafer at zip.com.au (Greg Schafer) wrote:

> 
> I still stand by what I said here:-
> 
> http://archive.linuxfromscratch.org/mail-archives/lfs-dev/2003/01/0399.html
> 
> IMHO, the evidence is mounting against the FSF version. And Ian should
> really gets his facts straight before sprouting off..

'scuse me? (were you missing a smiley?)

Heres some comments from you about the HJ release:

  - More closely follows CVS head

Not in itself good...

  - Possibly less stable due to newer code

Definitely not good...

  - Sometimes there is breakage when upgrading to a HJ release
immediately
    after release so usually best to wait a week for the dust to settle 

And unstable too.

Hardly counts as 'evidence mounting against it' really.

-- 
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-dev' in the subject header of the message



More information about the lfs-dev mailing list