Major CVS LFS bug - binutils-220.127.116.11
spyro at f2s.com
Tue Jan 28 01:48:01 PST 2003
On Tue, 28 Jan 2003 03:28:26 +0000 (UTC)
gschafer at zip.com.au (Greg Schafer) wrote:
> I still stand by what I said here:-
> IMHO, the evidence is mounting against the FSF version. And Ian should
> really gets his facts straight before sprouting off..
'scuse me? (were you missing a smiley?)
Heres some comments from you about the HJ release:
- More closely follows CVS head
Not in itself good...
- Possibly less stable due to newer code
Definitely not good...
- Sometimes there is breakage when upgrading to a HJ release
after release so usually best to wait a week for the dust to settle
And unstable too.
Hardly counts as 'evidence mounting against it' really.
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-dev' in the subject header of the message
More information about the lfs-dev