Major CVS LFS bug - binutils-2.13.2.1

Ian Molton spyro at f2s.com
Tue Jan 28 01:55:09 PST 2003


On Tue, 28 Jan 2003 07:05:07 +0000 (UTC)
dagmar.wants at nospam.com (Dagmar d'Surreal) wrote:

> 
> 
> I suggest a two-tiered plan of attack to save wear & tear on
> end-users. For _now_, since we know that it won't cause breakage for
> binaries drop back to 2.13.2.  In the space of say, a week or two,
> once we're more certain there's nothing ugly and scary in the _beta_
> release HJL emits, then change the book to use the HJL version in the
> interim while we wait for the next boringly-stable and
> cross-platformly tested GNU binutils with a less lengthy version
> number.

Why dont we stick with the similarly boringly stable 2.13.12 right up
until the next boringly stable GNU version?

boringly stable is GOOD.
-- 
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-dev' in the subject header of the message



More information about the lfs-dev mailing list