Major CVS LFS bug - binutils-

Rainer Peter Feller rainer at
Tue Jan 28 04:23:05 PST 2003

On Tue, 28 Jan 2003, Ian Molton wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Jan 2003 12:16:24 +0100
> Johan Veenstra <j.h.veenstra at> wrote:
> > The OS part of your platform definition is not that important to a
> > project like let's say LINUX From Scratch. So let's use what works for
> > linux.
> Thats a little shortsighted.
> I know its a long (maybe infinite :) time off, but I'd like to see LFS
> become something greater - more of an 'OS from scratch', and Im not the
> only one - theres at least one other NOW who would like to make as close
> to a linux/hurd type system as possible.

I know I don't belong to the dev-part of LFS but I could nothing but agree
to Ian, it should be wort the trouble to be as open as possible, (B)LFS
could be a great help upgrading other *nix like OSes like solaris or irix.

CUH Rainer Peter Feller

Unsubscribe: send email to listar at
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-dev' in the subject header of the message

More information about the lfs-dev mailing list