jason at tommyk.com
Mon Jun 30 12:30:36 PDT 2003
Scot Mc Pherson wrote:
> Alright well it look like the consensus of the community is to have properly
> named newsgroups.
> I would like to take a general poll though.
> Do we want to have the newsgroups named ala usenet standards
> lfs.topic [...]
I would say yes. Blfs is sort of a child of lfs anyway so I don't
really see a problem with lfs being a generic top level for those things
which are part of lfs and blfs. I guess if we wanted to be totaly
correct it would be lfs.lfs.[book,dev] and lfs.blfs.[book,dev] for those
type of things
> Either that or do we want to use fully usenet standard group names i.e.
> comp.os.linux.lfs.topic ? Is there a chance we will feed into usenet? I
Not a bad idea, but might be a bit extreme. Your call.
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-dev' in the subject header of the message
More information about the lfs-dev