[drepper at redhat.com: glibc 2.3.2]

Greg Schafer gschafer at zip.com.au
Mon Mar 3 21:08:15 PST 2003

On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 04:15:02PM +1100, Ryan.Oliver at pha.com.au wrote:
> Not necessary
> `--without-tls'
>      By default the C library is built with support for thread-local
>      storage if the used tools support it.  By using `--without-tls'
>      this can be prevented though there generally is no reason since it
>      creates compatibility problems.
> > - gcc-3.3 or the RHL8 branch of 3.2.x for gcc "__thread" keyword support
> >
> > Dunno.
> Me either ;-)
> may look into it for a bit of fun later in the week, see how the build
> holds up on the bleeding edge ;-)

Yeah, I noticed that. But I think its wrong :-) Ulrich was talking about
enabling it by default in the next release i.e. 2.3.3

I'll double check.

Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-dev' in the subject header of the message

More information about the lfs-dev mailing list