[drepper at redhat.com: glibc 2.3.2]
gschafer at zip.com.au
Mon Mar 3 21:23:36 PST 2003
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 04:08:15PM +1100, Greg Schafer wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 04:15:02PM +1100, Ryan.Oliver at pha.com.au wrote:
> > Not necessary
> > `--without-tls'
> > By default the C library is built with support for thread-local
> > storage if the used tools support it. By using `--without-tls'
> > this can be prevented though there generally is no reason since it
> > creates compatibility problems.
> > > - gcc-3.3 or the RHL8 branch of 3.2.x for gcc "__thread" keyword support
> > >
> > > Dunno.
> > Me either ;-)
> > may look into it for a bit of fun later in the week, see how the build
> > holds up on the bleeding edge ;-)
> Yeah, I noticed that. But I think its wrong :-) Ulrich was talking about
> enabling it by default in the next release i.e. 2.3.3
> I'll double check.
/* Define if binutils support TLS handling. */
-/* #undef HAVE_TLS_SUPPORT */ <----- the default
+#define HAVE_TLS_SUPPORT 1 <----- "--with-tls"
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-dev' in the subject header of the message
More information about the lfs-dev