libiberty revisited

Greg Schafer gschafer at zip.com.au
Wed Mar 5 14:55:41 PST 2003


On Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 06:03:48PM +0000, James Iwanek wrote:
> just looked at the libiberty user guide and i think we really should still
> be installing the libiberty files, the exert from the libiberty user guide
> and link below should back this up:
> 
> For your own projects, an approach which offers stability and flexibility is
> to include libiberty with your code, but allow the end user to optionally
> choose to use a previously-installed version instead. In this way the user
> may choose (for example) to install libiberty as part of GCC, and use that
> version for all software built with that compiler. (This approach has
> proven useful with software using the GNU readline library.) 
> 
> http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libiberty/Using.html

No one has yet stepped up to the challenge that I offered here:-

http://archive.linuxfromscratch.org/mail-archives/lfs-dev/2003/02/0493.html

Unless someone can nominate a legitimate package that *depends* on an
already installed libiberty then it should die IMHO.

Greg
-- 
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-dev' in the subject header of the message



More information about the lfs-dev mailing list