The CFLAGS should go

Ryan.Oliver at pha.com.au Ryan.Oliver at pha.com.au
Wed May 7 05:27:21 PDT 2003


> On Wed, May 07, 2003 at 05:16:12PM +1000, Ryan.Oliver at pha.com.au wrote:
> > If thats the case (removing LDFLAGS from make lines), we may just want
to
> > revert to
> > 'export CC="gcc -s"' instead...
> > Not all packages pick up LDFLAGS from the environment, but they
definitely
> > pick up CC ...
>
> It's not perfect:-
>
>
http://archive.linuxfromscratch.org/mail-archives/lfs-dev/2003/02/0000.html

Doh!

> so my preference would be to keep "-s" in the LDFLAGS. Sure, some
packages
> will miss out but anyone who cares about the space saving can just refer
to
> the hint.
>
> Greg

Looks like a case of damned if we do, damned if we dont...

Maybe supply the LDFLAGS only to those packages that don't behave?

[R]


-- 
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-dev' in the subject header of the message



More information about the lfs-dev mailing list