The CFLAGS should go
tushart at abbnm.com
Wed May 7 09:00:06 PDT 2003
Jeroen Coumans wrote:
> I remember Matthias Benkmann being strongly against the LDFLAGS. If
> it's policy not to have policy in the book then they should also be in
> the seperate hint.
> Reasons for LDFLAGS in the book:
> - saves space, compiling time?
> - every bit in PLFS accounted for so it doesn't affect the final LFS
> Reasons against LDFLAGS in the book:
> - another possibility for typo's (c'mon, everybody makes 'm ;)
> - building should start from a clean environment to prevent errors;
> this is what MSB protested against. I don't know if his argument still
> stands but it has convinced me not to use LDFLAGS during the building
> of the toolchain.
I agree. LDFLAGS is an optimization. So its not for the book to specify.
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-dev' in the subject header of the message
More information about the lfs-dev