The CFLAGS should go
gerard at linuxfromscratch.org
Wed May 7 09:33:07 PDT 2003
On May 7, 2003 12:42 am, Greg Schafer wrote:
> I've mentioned this twice before.
Sorry for not having noticed before. In my defense I was rather busy and when
I caught up to 800+ emails it seems I dozed off during reading a few of them.
> to get rid of it. The only purpose was to strip out the "-g" and thus save
> space during the builds.
And honestly I don't think it's that big of a deal. One can always run that
strip command in chapter 9 right.
> The LDFLAGS="-s" in the "Setting up the environment" should stay but all
> the CFLAGS should go IMHO. The various "LDFLAGS" on the make command lines
> for binutils and gcc could probably go as well (apart from the static pass
> 1 builds).
> I'd also get rid of the gcc "no_debug" patches while we're at it.
Fine with me too.
> Maybe these space saving tips could go into a separate hint or sumthin..
Do you want to write such a hint?
> Just my recommendation of course.
And a sound one at that. I'll take care of this when I'm done my paying-job
today (an hour to go). I will file it in Bugzilla just in case it slips my
/* Linux Consultant --- OSDN / DevChannel *
* Technical Writer --- CheapBytes */
/* If Linux doesn't have the solution, you have the wrong problem */
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-dev' in the subject header of the message
More information about the lfs-dev