CVS -vs- 4.1

Jesse Tie-Ten-Quee highos at
Wed May 7 19:16:45 PDT 2003


On Thu, May 08, 2003 at 02:13:23AM +0000, Mike Miller wrote:
> All right.  So I'm about to make a new LFS version (as our current one is 
> aging quite nicely) and curious as to opinion on if I should follow CVS or 
> 4.1 versions of the book.  There are a TON of major changes in the way 
> things are getting done (from the pure LFS doc).  Has this been stable 
> enough to build critical services off of or should I take the safe 4.1 
> route?

Use 4.0.

Jesse Tie-Ten-Quee  ( highos at linuxfromscratch dot org )
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-dev' in the subject header of the message

More information about the lfs-dev mailing list