GCC 2.95.3 bug in current LFS (was Pure LFS gcc-2.95.3)

Ronald Hummelink ronald at hummelink.xs4all.nl
Sun May 11 05:32:04 PDT 2003

On Sun, 2003-05-11 at 01:57, Jeremy Utley wrote:

> The currently running solution is to do --enable-languages=c,c++ ... but
> will there ever be a need for C++ support in the 2.95.3 compiler?

I guess the only need is libstdc++, to get some of the browser plugins
or precompiled binary software to work. This is currently in blfs i

> I know most of us here follow lfs-support, but I felt this was more an
> issue for lfs-dev at this point.
> -J-
Linux is like a small snowball rolling downhill. Microsoft is just
waiting down the mountain...

Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-dev' in the subject header of the message

More information about the lfs-dev mailing list