GCC 2.95.3 bug in current LFS (was Pure LFS gcc-2.95.3)
ronald at hummelink.xs4all.nl
Sun May 11 05:32:04 PDT 2003
On Sun, 2003-05-11 at 01:57, Jeremy Utley wrote:
> The currently running solution is to do --enable-languages=c,c++ ... but
> will there ever be a need for C++ support in the 2.95.3 compiler?
I guess the only need is libstdc++, to get some of the browser plugins
or precompiled binary software to work. This is currently in blfs i
> I know most of us here follow lfs-support, but I felt this was more an
> issue for lfs-dev at this point.
Linux is like a small snowball rolling downhill. Microsoft is just
waiting down the mountain...
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-dev' in the subject header of the message
More information about the lfs-dev