Missing gcc conf option [was Re: Strange GCC failures in
lnxfreak123 at insightbb.com
Tue May 13 11:20:17 PDT 2003
On Mon, 2003-05-12 at 22:10, Greg Schafer wrote:
> On Mon, May 12, 2003 at 09:58:36PM -0500, Thomas Pegg wrote:
> > On Mon, 2003-05-12 at 21:41, Gerard Beekmans wrote:
> > > On May 12, 2003 08:37 pm, Ryan.Oliver at pha.com.au wrote:
> > > > If they aren't up to date on the host I have always built them for the host
> > >
> > > So can it be the tools on the host system are used if detected. If you don't
> > > happen to have it on the host system, the files in /stage1/bin will be used?
> > It would probably work either way, but as with my system I did not have
> > tcl, expect or dejagnu on my current LFS system and only installed tcl,
> > etc. in /stage1 according to chapter 5 instructions and the test for gcc
> > and binutils failed miserably. But the only way the test's would pass is
> > if they were only installed on the host system prior to building. At
> > least that is what corrected it on my system.
> "failed miserably" doesn't help us much. We need more detail on actual
> failures to try and see what's up. Like testsuite summary and logfile for
> starters.. (not to the list - d/l from somewhere preferably)
> Obviously, there's a problem as multiple peeps seem to be experiencing it.
> But buggered if I can spot it.
If it's logs you want, you got it.
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-dev' in the subject header of the message
More information about the lfs-dev