omission in book for ch5 glibc build [ was Re: Bug, error and/or question? ]

Greg Schafer gschafer at zip.com.au
Wed May 14 02:54:55 PDT 2003


On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 06:25:50PM +0100, Matthew Burgess wrote:
> Wasn't there something under the PITA (Pure Iterative Test Analysis?)

PITA ? I can think of another meaning for that acronym that is rather apt
:-)

> thread about the glibc libs/binaries not matching if the /etc/ld.so.conf
> file was missing, or was it a configure test that b0rked due to mmap
> stuff breaking?  Oh I dunno, can't remember exactly now but it rings a
> bell anyway.  Maybe Ryan or Greg can help me out here...please :)

No. The mmap test breaks if /etc/ld.so.cache file is < 1 memory page in
size. Nothing to do with /etc/ld.so.conf.

Greg
-- 
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-dev' in the subject header of the message



More information about the lfs-dev mailing list