Ch5 binutils pass 2 make check error
gschafer at zip.com.au
Thu May 15 00:31:02 PDT 2003
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 08:23:16AM +0100, Michael Villeza wrote:
> > No, the hint does not mention gcc-core (unless I'm
> > mistaken).
> I think it's in the LFSv4.0, i cannot remember.
> > In the binutils case, unexpected failures are the
> > ones to worry about. So
> > you have nothing to worry about there.
> If that's the case, then i'm more worried. I can't
> even understand UNEXPECTED FAILURES, unless you can
> explain that to me. Better go back to basics but this
> time i'll use gcc full instead of gcc-core. Thanks.
Doh! I'm an idiot. Please disregard anything I say! :-)
Now I see there WAS unpected failures in those you quoted. Yes they are a
problem and should be investigated. But if they are the ones due to the
missing c++ complier, then you know what to do to get rid of them.
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-dev' in the subject header of the message
More information about the lfs-dev