SPAM[RBL] Re: Preliminary GCC 3.3 LFS
gschafer at zip.com.au
Thu May 15 15:06:39 PDT 2003
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 04:55:23PM +0200, Michael Labuschke wrote:
> On 15.05.2003 at 23:48 Greg Schafer wrote:
> >On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 11:13:06AM +1000, Ryan.Oliver at pha.com.au wrote:
> >> You may want to double check if that mmap patch is still needed, so far
> >> from my gcc 3.3 builds it hasn't...
> >I've just confirmed that the mmap patch IS still req'd for gcc-3.3. The
> >gcc-pass2 build gives:-
> >checking for working mmap from /dev/zero... no
> >checking for working mmap with MAP_ANON(YMOUS)... no
> >which is no good.
> >The size of my /stage1/etc/ld/so.cache file at the time of gcc confgure is
> >3124 bytes i.e. less than 1 memory page.
> can't we just increase the size of ld.so.conf ?
> so there won't be a need for patching ?
No, it's the ld.so.cache, not the ld.so.conf. Putting random gunk into
ld.so.conf and rerunning ldconfig will not increase the size of the
ld.so.cache. Unless I've missed your point..
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-dev' in the subject header of the message
More information about the lfs-dev