update to binutils-2.13.2.1? (CVS 20030514)

Greg Schafer gschafer at zip.com.au
Thu May 15 17:17:00 PDT 2003


On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 07:52:48PM -0400, Zack Winkles wrote:
> On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 04:26:05PM -0700, Matt Bartley (mbartley2 at cox.NOSPAM.net) wrote:
> > Could be book be updated to use binutils-2.13.2.1?  I've used 2.13.2.1 
> > for LFS builds for several weeks now, and haven't seen a problem, as 
> > long as I don't go to the unrecommended bleeding edge and attempt to add 
> > CFLAGS to the binutils build.
> > 
> > I searched the lfs-dev archives and the only mentions of 2.13.2.1 this 
> > year were about how the ".1" in its version number was breaking the 
> > configure/make for the then-current gcc-3.2.1.
> 
> Version 2.13.2.1 will be going in along with GCC 3.3. It's currently in
> testing right now.

Wow, I thought the old 4 digit version string problem was still there i.e.
the fix didn't make it into the 3.3 branch.

But I just double checked and our very own Chris Lingard followed up with the
gcc RM to get it in at the last minute. Thanks Chris! :-)

Greg
-- 
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-dev' in the subject header of the message



More information about the lfs-dev mailing list