The move to custom XML

Ken Dyke ken_i_m at
Mon May 19 06:30:37 PDT 2003

On Sunday 18 May 2003 22:12, Archaic wrote:
> On Sun, May 18, 2003 at 11:39:13PM -0400, Timothy Bauscher wrote:
> >  * Should an effort be made to create a profile-like book?
> >    ie: A book which can be used for automated installs.
> Personally, I'd say no. If this is meant to be a learning tool, then it
> shouldn't be automated. Now some may say that they've built lfs many
> times over and want it automated. How much more learning is gained by
> scripting it themselves (as a vast majority of us do, anyway)?

If there is minimal additional effort to structure the XML to facilitate an 
automated build system without compromising the primary function of LFS, then 
where is the loss?

The gain is that as a sys admin, I don't have to expend duplicate effort on 
maintaining my own buildscripts then I will be more motivated to contribute 
directly to LFS maintanence/development.  In practice, I have not had time to 
stay "current" on an on-going basis so it is a task that gets addressed every 
six to twelve months.

Under the current system I see a large gap between the energy I can expend to 
contribute and the energy required to implement the docbook XML system 
(judging from the pain reported on the mailing lists).

I am all for a scheme that will close that gap.  Whatever that scheme may be.

I think, therefore, ken_i_m
Chief Gadgeteer,
Elegant Innovations

Unsubscribe: send email to listar at
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-dev' in the subject header of the message

More information about the lfs-dev mailing list