gcc-2.95.3, lfs-cvs, c++
pinskie at physics.uc.edu
Tue May 20 14:28:09 PDT 2003
> On Tue, 20 May 2003, Edward Pinski wrote:
> > Hello all,
> > Since we are installing the c++ compiler in chapter 6 during
> > the installation of 2.95.3, we should probably make it such that it will
> > work correctly as done in BLFS, or just make it --enable-languages=c
> > otherwise we will be installing a broken c++ compiler from 2.95.3 if
> > somebody needs to compile a package with it. Obviously the C compiler
> > works fine, otherwise things would have been changed by now. But
> > anyway, if we're gonna enable it, we should more than likely create
> > a working compiler, than a borked compiler which does not work. I
> > personally think we should just drop it, since it's not needed for
> > lfs building.
> > Edward Pinski
> --enable-languages=c,c++ only got back in about two weeks ago! If
> you only build c, -Wreturn-type is not recognised as a valid flag in c.
> Yes, this is a bug in gcc's build, so feel free to submit a patch upstream.
> Meanwhile, building without c++ breaks at least nvidia's scripts.
If that's the case, then we should fix the c++ so that it work.
Rather than just building c++ to fix the c compiler. That way we're
not installing a broken c++ compiler.
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-dev' in the subject header of the message
More information about the lfs-dev