Proposal for lfs-bootscripts

conathan at conathan at
Wed May 21 13:04:07 PDT 2003

> Gerard Beekmans wrote:
>> On May 20, 2003 04:09 pm, conathan at wrote:
>> I don't have the time at the moment to test your scripts right now, but
>> I
>> do like the concept behind it. It makes the network scripts more generic
>> and modular. Eventhough DHCP is a BLFS issue, it's not a bad idea to
>> have
>> a generic type of network script that can deal with any service easily
>> without having to rewrite a bunch of files to make it all happen.
>> I'd like to pursue this matter definitely, but not right now. I'll add a
>> note in Bugzilla about this. Are you able to keep that tarball on that
>> server for a while?
> ive got copies here - ill test them tonight and ill generate a diff
> against
> the 1.12 prepatch i put in bugzilla (btw: have you noticed that yet?)

make sure that dhcp, and ifconfig.eth{0,1} never enter the book, the
entire thing was supose to be an example.

Unsubscribe: send email to listar at
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-dev' in the subject header of the message

More information about the lfs-dev mailing list