Proposal for lfs-bootscripts

James Iwanek chthon at
Wed May 21 14:21:55 PDT 2003

conathan at wrote:

>> Gerard Beekmans wrote:
>>> On May 20, 2003 04:09 pm, conathan at wrote:
>>> I don't have the time at the moment to test your scripts right now, but
>>> I
>>> do like the concept behind it. It makes the network scripts more generic
>>> and modular. Eventhough DHCP is a BLFS issue, it's not a bad idea to
>>> have
>>> a generic type of network script that can deal with any service easily
>>> without having to rewrite a bunch of files to make it all happen.
>>> I'd like to pursue this matter definitely, but not right now. I'll add a
>>> note in Bugzilla about this. Are you able to keep that tarball on that
>>> server for a while?
>> ive got copies here - ill test them tonight and ill generate a diff
>> against
>> the 1.12 prepatch i put in bugzilla (btw: have you noticed that yet?)
> make sure that dhcp, and ifconfig.eth{0,1} never enter the book, the
> entire thing was supose to be an example.

yeah, no problem
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-dev' in the subject header of the message

More information about the lfs-dev mailing list