The devpts issue
andersonlizardo at yahoo.com.br
Sun Sep 21 14:16:53 PDT 2003
Jeremy Utley wrote:
> The real problem here, is when people are using their LFS systems as
> a base, and their LFS systems do not support devpts, because the book
> never enforced that before. To put it bluntly, there are 3
> possibilities, not 5 like Anderson mentions:
That was just my detailed report ;-). Put (1) and (2) on the same case,
and remove the 4th case (because it needs the "generic" option for
MAKEDEV, which is not what you want).
> Host has devpts support: mount the devpts system under chroot
> Host does NOT have devpts support, but does have devfs support:
> mount the /dev/pts portion of devfs into the chroot with a mount
This enforces a 2.4 host kernel. Is it what we want?
More information about the lfs-dev