gcc specs patch

James Robertson jwrober at linuxfromscratch.org
Tue Sep 23 07:00:06 PDT 2003

Jeremy Utley wrote:

> On 2003-09-23, Kevin P. Fleming <kpfleming at linuxfromscratch.org> wrote:
>>I see that the CVS book now incorporates Greg's new 
>>gcc-3.3.1-specs-2.patch. However, there was already a 
>>gcc-3.3.1-specs-4.patch (and even a -6.patch) on the patches project. 
>>Can we reconcile these so there won't be so much confusion when 
>>someone gets ready to do a build? If the patches project specs patches 
>>are no longer needed, then they should removed.
> The stuff on the patches project is stuff submitted by others in the
> community, and by no means is anything "official" to LFS.  These
> patch submitters should actually be naming their patches with a more
> descriptive indication of exactly what they are meant to accomplish.
> -J-

But I was under the impression that the patches project was also going 
to "host" the "official used-by-the-book" patches as well.  If so, Kevin 
is right and this needs to be resolved.


More information about the lfs-dev mailing list