gcc specs patch
jwrober at linuxfromscratch.org
Tue Sep 23 07:00:06 PDT 2003
Jeremy Utley wrote:
> On 2003-09-23, Kevin P. Fleming <kpfleming at linuxfromscratch.org> wrote:
>>I see that the CVS book now incorporates Greg's new
>>gcc-3.3.1-specs-2.patch. However, there was already a
>>gcc-3.3.1-specs-4.patch (and even a -6.patch) on the patches project.
>>Can we reconcile these so there won't be so much confusion when
>>someone gets ready to do a build? If the patches project specs patches
>>are no longer needed, then they should removed.
> The stuff on the patches project is stuff submitted by others in the
> community, and by no means is anything "official" to LFS. These
> patch submitters should actually be naming their patches with a more
> descriptive indication of exactly what they are meant to accomplish.
But I was under the impression that the patches project was also going
to "host" the "official used-by-the-book" patches as well. If so, Kevin
is right and this needs to be resolved.
More information about the lfs-dev