Should the build commands be reinstallable?
dj at lucasit.com
Wed Jan 7 15:08:50 PST 2004
Greg Schafer wrote:
> Currently, there is a bunch of packages that fail to reinstall when using
> the book's commands, mainly due to use of "ln -s" instead of "ln -sf".
> There's also a couple of "mkdir" 's instead of "mkdir -p" 's as well. And
> lastly, bzip2 refuses to reinstall unless a "rm -f /usr/bin/bz*" is slipped
> in before the "make install".
> So should we have an official policy on this?
I'm only a couple of days late in reply to this thread, but I thought it
worth mentioning a little history. What was the way to build a 'clean'
LFS system before you and Ryan buckled down on PLFS? Do chapter 6 agian
right over the top of itself. I think that may have something to do
with the reason for the 'ln -sf's and 'mkdir -p's.
> It's easy enough to make the
> changes but do we really want to? A downside to the "ln -sf" 's is that the
> first time reader may not see an error that would otherwise show up if they
> made a typo.
IMO it's not necessary anymore.
More information about the lfs-dev