Bug #114: expand setclock script
bdubbs at swbell.net
Mon Jan 12 20:04:33 PST 2004
Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
>On Tuesday 13 January 2004 06:38, Gerard Beekmans wrote:
>>There has been some discussion going back and forth on this matter and I
>>haven't read a satisfactory answer what to do when ntp is not used and
>>if the hardware clock should be saved to match the current system clock.
>I think that the principle of the least astonishment (or "do what other
>distros do" if you like it better) applies here. I vote for saving the time
>into the hardware clock on shutdown.
This is my feeling too.
More information about the lfs-dev