Bug #114: expand setclock script

Bruce Dubbs bdubbs at swbell.net
Mon Jan 12 20:04:33 PST 2004


Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:

>On Tuesday 13 January 2004 06:38, Gerard Beekmans wrote:
>
>  
>
>>There has been some discussion going back and forth on this matter and I
>>haven't read a satisfactory answer what to do when ntp is not used and
>>if the hardware clock should be saved to match the current system clock.
>>    
>>
>
>I think that the principle of the least astonishment (or "do what other 
>distros do" if you like it better) applies here. I vote for saving the time 
>into the hardware clock on shutdown.
>

This is my feeling too.
  -- Bruce





More information about the lfs-dev mailing list