Bug #114: expand setclock script

Matthias Benkmann matthias at winterdrache.de
Tue Jan 13 12:23:25 PST 2004

What exactly is this discussion about? I've looked at bug 114 and it looks
like it's all about adding the line

hwclock --systohc

to the stop) part of setclock and possibly

hwclock --adjust

to the start) part. Is this all this thread is about?


p.s.: ATM setclock doesn't seem to check for start) and stop).
While this does work because it doesn't have a K... link, it's bad style.
This should be fixed. All LFS boot scripts should conform to the template.

I didn't know it was impossible when I did it.

More information about the lfs-dev mailing list