Bug #114: expand setclock script
matthias at winterdrache.de
Tue Jan 13 12:23:25 PST 2004
What exactly is this discussion about? I've looked at bug 114 and it looks
like it's all about adding the line
to the stop) part of setclock and possibly
to the start) part. Is this all this thread is about?
p.s.: ATM setclock doesn't seem to check for start) and stop).
While this does work because it doesn't have a K... link, it's bad style.
This should be fixed. All LFS boot scripts should conform to the template.
I didn't know it was impossible when I did it.
More information about the lfs-dev