plans and wishes
tushar at linuxfromscratch.org
Sun Jan 18 22:05:51 PST 2004
Joel Miller wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Jan 2004 22:58:20 +0100, Alex Groenewoud
> <alex at linuxfromscratch.org> wrote:
>> Which would probably lead to more support requests. And yet we use
>> /tools and not $TOOLS, and don't get any mails about that. Except if
> You are comparing apples to oranges. Using the /tools symlink is
> required as when one enters chroot the packages installed in chapter
> five will be located in /tools. That is the point of making the /tools
> symlink in the first place.
From what I understood, what he meant is that instead of hadcoding
/tools in all the places, an env var could have been used instead and
then the user can use any directory he wants, /tools, /stage1, /staging...
Anyways, just clarifying. I am not in favor of eliminating $LFS.
More information about the lfs-dev