AW: Glibc Patch

Gerard Beekmans gerard at linuxfromscratch.org
Mon Jan 26 05:08:50 PST 2004


On Mon, 2004-01-26 at 00:48, Michael Labuschke wrote:
> So much about "glibc cvs is stable. We will not release a 'stable' tarball."
> attitude.

I think Glibc can be considered stable, with a stable kernel. The 2.6
kernel is a bit too new to be called entirely stable IMO. Let's try a
point release or two down the road, maybe things will improve.

-- 
Gerard Beekmans

/* If Linux doesn't have the solution, you have the wrong problem */




More information about the lfs-dev mailing list