gerard at linuxfromscratch.org
Thu Jan 29 06:35:00 PST 2004
On Thu, 2004-01-29 at 07:14, Billy O'Connor wrote:
> But we still recommend that people use the stable version of the
> book, so what does it matter if we have a "one off" version from cvs
> that has some update or other? IOW, the "responsible" version of the
> book wouldn't be recommended for use, what good does that do us?
Can you rephrase that, I'm not sure I'm getting the point.
Do you see a problem with Ronald's suggestion?
/* If Linux doesn't have the solution, you have the wrong problem */
More information about the lfs-dev