Roadmap update

Billy O'Connor billyoc at
Thu Jan 29 06:45:27 PST 2004

Gerard Beekmans <gerard at> writes:

> On Thu, 2004-01-29 at 07:14, Billy O'Connor wrote:
>> But we still recommend that people use the stable version of the
>> book, so what does it matter if we have a "one off" version from cvs
>> that has some update or other?  IOW, the "responsible" version of the
>> book wouldn't be recommended for use, what good does that do us?
> Can you rephrase that, I'm not sure I'm getting the point.
> Do you see a problem with Ronald's suggestion?

No, I misread his suggestion.  I agree that we should get a .x
version of the book if a similar kernel security bug arises in the

LFS Unassigned

More information about the lfs-dev mailing list