Roadmap update

Anderson Lizardo lizardo at
Thu Jan 29 08:48:02 PST 2004

On Thursday 29 January 2004 10:40, Bill Maltby, LFS Organizational wrote:
> Maybe this can be addressed with a slightly different tack? There were
> suggestions in the past about use of the wiki for errata. ISTM that
> security issues *do* justify a point release, but that has effects we
> would like to avoid (work load and related activities being driven by
> asynchronous events may ruin any attempts at scheduling and sticking to
> the roadmap).

IMHO, an errata should be used to insert editor's notes/warnings, typos on 
instructions, clarifications on the text. That is, bugs related to the book's 
text, not its packages. IMHO, a package bug justifies a minor version 

Anderson Lizardo
lizardo at

More information about the lfs-dev mailing list